Football Teams - What's In A Name?

In this modern age we are constantly hit with the idea of brand loyalty. How will customers, or fans, be able to make that connection with a company or team without continuity in a name? While Green Bay has always been the Packers, not every team has always played under the name they have today.

The Chicago Bears started out as the Decatur Staleys. The Decatur Staleys? Try picturing fans nowadays cheering for the mighty Decatur Staleys.

When the AFL came about in 1960 the New York team was the New York Titans. After two unproductive seasons, the new ownership changed the name to the New York Jets. Years later, Titans would resurface in the NFL when Tennessee changed its name from Oilers to Titans after moving from Houston to Nashville (with a brief stay in Memphis as the Tennessee Oilers).

In 1983, the USFL had a franchise start in Boston, Massachusetts as the Boston Breakers. In 1984 they moved to New Orleans and became the New Orleans Breakers, followed by a move in 1985 to Portland, Oregon and another name change; this time to the Portland Breakers.

The mid-70's World Footbal League 's New York Stars relocated to Charlotte North Carolina, played one game as the Charlotte Stars before changing their name to the Charlotte Hornets over a decade before the NBA's Charlotte Hornets came along.

The Kansas City Chiefs have some of the most vocal and loyal fans in the NFL, few of them were there to cheer the team when they were first known as the Dallas Texans. The NFL would again bring back a previously used AFL name when the expansion Houston franchise took the name of Texans in 2002.

The name game is also prevalent in the Canadian Football League. The most extreme CFL example would be the Montreal Alouettes. The Alouettes played in the CFL from 1946 until the team ceased to exist in 1981. In 1982 a new Montreal football team joined the CFL, the Montreal Concordes. Two years later the Concordes renamed themselves the Alouettes before going out of business themselves not long after. The saga of the Alouettes doesn't end there. The CFL had a short lived franchise in the American city of Baltimore which debuted as the Baltimore Colts, and then due to litigation changed its name to the Baltimore CFL Colts and the Baltimore CFLers, before finally settling on the Baltimore Stallions. When the NFL announced the Cleveland Browns would be relocating to Baltimore and becoming the Ravens, the ownership of the Baltimore Stallions moved the team to Montreal and became the latest incarnation of the Montreal Alouettes.

The Arizona Cardinals, back in the time they played in Chicago, were known early on as the Racine Normals.

Originally playing football as the Portsmouth Spartans, the Detroit Lions would go on to become one of the oldest NFL franchises.

Playing their first games as the Boston Patriots, the team changed its geographic name to New England without even moving. Not unheard of, the Phoenix Cardinals similarly became the Arizona Cardinals without moving.

Because of World War II and the shortage of players, the Eagles and Steelers merged for a year forming the Phil-Pitt Steagles.

The Rams have been the Cleveland Rams and Los Angeles Rams before settling in St. Louis as the St. Louis Rams in 1995.

Though Seattle has always been the Seahawks, there was a prior Seahawks in professional football. In 1946, the AAFC had a team called the Miami Seahawks. That year Miami was horrible on and off the field and ended up folding and going out of business.

The World Football League of the 1970s had a team known as the Memphis Southmen, the franchise had originally been planned to be in Toronto and have the nickname of the Toronto Northmen.

Even the National Football League itself was originally named the American Professional Football Association, or the APFA.

So, really... what's in a name?

Mark Peters combined his love for trivial information with his passion for football and came up with a little something we like to call IQFB.com. Whether settling a bet or you just want to read through loads of football facts and information, IQFB.com is the place for you.

Football Teams - What's In A Name?

In this modern age we are constantly hit with the idea of brand loyalty. How will customers, or fans, be able to make that connection with a company or team without continuity in a name? While Green Bay has always been the Packers, not every team has always played under the name they have today.

The Chicago Bears started out as the Decatur Staleys. The Decatur Staleys? Try picturing fans nowadays cheering for the mighty Decatur Staleys.

When the AFL came about in 1960 the New York team was the New York Titans. After two unproductive seasons, the new ownership changed the name to the New York Jets. Years later, Titans would resurface in the NFL when Tennessee changed its name from Oilers to Titans after moving from Houston to Nashville (with a brief stay in Memphis as the Tennessee Oilers).

In 1983, the USFL had a franchise start in Boston, Massachusetts as the Boston Breakers. In 1984 they moved to New Orleans and became the New Orleans Breakers, followed by a move in 1985 to Portland, Oregon and another name change; this time to the Portland Breakers.

The mid-70's World Footbal League 's New York Stars relocated to Charlotte North Carolina, played one game as the Charlotte Stars before changing their name to the Charlotte Hornets over a decade before the NBA's Charlotte Hornets came along.

The Kansas City Chiefs have some of the most vocal and loyal fans in the NFL, few of them were there to cheer the team when they were first known as the Dallas Texans. The NFL would again bring back a previously used AFL name when the expansion Houston franchise took the name of Texans in 2002.

The name game is also prevalent in the Canadian Football League. The most extreme CFL example would be the Montreal Alouettes. The Alouettes played in the CFL from 1946 until the team ceased to exist in 1981. In 1982 a new Montreal football team joined the CFL, the Montreal Concordes. Two years later the Concordes renamed themselves the Alouettes before going out of business themselves not long after. The saga of the Alouettes doesn't end there. The CFL had a short lived franchise in the American city of Baltimore which debuted as the Baltimore Colts, and then due to litigation changed its name to the Baltimore CFL Colts and the Baltimore CFLers, before finally settling on the Baltimore Stallions. When the NFL announced the Cleveland Browns would be relocating to Baltimore and becoming the Ravens, the ownership of the Baltimore Stallions moved the team to Montreal and became the latest incarnation of the Montreal Alouettes.

The Arizona Cardinals, back in the time they played in Chicago, were known early on as the Racine Normals.

Originally playing football as the Portsmouth Spartans, the Detroit Lions would go on to become one of the oldest NFL franchises.

Playing their first games as the Boston Patriots, the team changed its geographic name to New England without even moving. Not unheard of, the Phoenix Cardinals similarly became the Arizona Cardinals without moving.

Because of World War II and the shortage of players, the Eagles and Steelers merged for a year forming the Phil-Pitt Steagles.

The Rams have been the Cleveland Rams and Los Angeles Rams before settling in St. Louis as the St. Louis Rams in 1995.

Though Seattle has always been the Seahawks, there was a prior Seahawks in professional football. In 1946, the AAFC had a team called the Miami Seahawks. That year Miami was horrible on and off the field and ended up folding and going out of business.

The World Football League of the 1970s had a team known as the Memphis Southmen, the franchise had originally been planned to be in Toronto and have the nickname of the Toronto Northmen.

Even the National Football League itself was originally named the American Professional Football Association, or the APFA.

So, really... what's in a name?

Mark Peters combined his love for trivial information with his passion for football and came up with a little something we like to call IQFB.com. Whether settling a bet or you just want to read through loads of football facts and information, IQFB.com is the place for you.

4th and 1 in Youth Football, What's the Right Call?

4th and 1, what to do?

Bowl Game Scenarios, Play Calling Quandries

Like many of you I watched my fair share of College Football Bowl games this year. While as a youth football coach, you can't take what the college kids do and apply it directly to your youth football teams because of the obvious factors, the age and athleticism of the players, practice time etc etc. But what you can do is try to figure out what tactics, strategies, schemes and methods can be applied with the given restraints of youth football.

The Sneak or the Handoff?

One of the things that caught my attention was the number of 4th and short situations in the games I watched, short meaning 1 yard, more or less. The announcers were often battling each other as to what the correct call should be. As announcers often do, they played "pretend coach" and tried to make their case for a play to be run. In the Connecticut-Wake Forest game, UCONN was on the Wake Forest one. One announcer was asking for a quarterback sneak, his premise was that the sneak was the right call since the quarterback could hit it into the line quickly, not theatened by any deep penetration.

The other announcer was saying the quarterback wouldn't have enough momentum, this announcer was imploring that Connecticut give the ball on an inside handoff to the running back. What this announcer wanted to see was a running back with a full head of steam as the back made his try for endzone glory. The same was the case in the Florida State-Kentucky game, same scenario, FSU is on the Kentucky 1, 4th down. One announcer is pleading for the sneak, the other the tailback run. In both instances, the quarterback gave a deep handoff to a running back that was not only stopped short of the goal line, but short of the original line of scrimmage.

Why Not Combine the Two?

How do you apply this to your football plays when you are coaching youth football? Why not combine the best of both football plays and run neither?

My thoughts:

Pluses and MinusesBoth announcers were right in their analysis, the quarterback sneak gets you to the point of attack quicker and negates penetration due to how quickly it hits, but the quarterback is in so tight he has very little momentum to take him into the endzone. On the other hand, the deep handoff gives the back lots of time to gain momentum, but that same time frame used by him to gain momentum works against him as defenders now use that same time to penetrate, come off blocks and penetrate into the backfield. In the Connecticut game the quarterback reversed out, seated the ball and then gave the ball to a back that was lined up 7 yards from the line of scrimmage. The back had to "gain" 7 yards before he even broke even, sure he had lots of momentum, but he was tackled for a 1 yard loss.

How We Do It in Youth Football

How does this apply to youth football? We have 4th and 1's and 3rd and shorts too. We love the quick hitter of the quarterback sneak while we also like the handoff to the downhill running back. But Geez I hate the handoff here, the quarterback has to get a clean snap, seat the ball, then make a clean handoff, often reversing out of his stance to give to a running back that is often 5-7 yards from the line of scrimmage. But, Geez I hate the sneak too, my quarterback getting stoned by a defensive tackle or blitzing linebacker because he has no momentum.

Combining Both Plays

Why not get the best of both worlds, the quick hitter of the sneak along with the momentum of the deep handoff? That's one of the reasons I love the Single Wing Offense for youth football. Set the "quarterback" and running back just 2 yards from the line of scrimmage in the shortest of short "shotgun" snaps. On the base fullback wedge play that we like in these situations, the fullback takes the snap and runs right behind the apex of our snowplow wedge that at its apex puts the strength of 7 players on one poor defender, with the fullback running right behind this mass of humanity. If you've not seen this football play it is a sight to behold, see it in the play clips thumbnail on the main page of this website. I've never in 8 seasons seen this play lose yardage by a first team unit. Our "quarterback" on this play fakes a sweep to take pressure off the edges and take linebackers out of the play, but that really isn't necessary when needing just one yard. The best of both worlds in one football play.

How Adjustments Come To Life

Often times you learn to make adjustments to your system by what the kids intuitively start doing on their own. While many times the kids do things that often detract from the effectiveness of the play, some times their "adjustments" make sense. In one game the first year we were running this system we saw our fullback scooting up in his alignment from the normal 4 yards to about 2 yards. We noticed that when we ran misdirection plays with motion, we were gaining huge chunks of yardage and we were often facing fewer defenders at the point of attack. We had more meager results when another fullback was in at the "correct" depth of 4 yards.

10 Year Old Player Changes Our Offense Forever

We concluded that by scooting up that close, the linebackers and even defensive ends had no clue who the ball was being snapped to of the 3 closely aligned backs in the backfield. We then took that alignment to practice the next week and had the coaches crouch down to 10 year old age size and station themselves at linebacker and defensive end positions to see if they could see the ball. Even though we all knew the football plays, no one could see who the ball was being snapped to and because of our faking techniques, no one knew where the ball was going. That's how we made our "brilliant" adjustment, because of a 10 year old fullback, J. Adams.

Same 10 Year Old Makes Second Adjustment

Another thing we noticed Mr Adams would do, on short yardage situations he would come toward the line of scrimmage as he received the snap. He got to the point of attack much quicker and he got there with momentum. I talked about this with a coach at Menominee High School in Michigan. They have run this offense for over 25 years and just won back to back State Titles this year and last. Coach told me they always have their ballcarriers moving toward the point of attack on the snap count even when they are receiving the snap. While we do not "directional snap" like Menominee does on every play, we do have our fullback moving forward on the snap count on the fullback wedge plays where he carries the ball. We have the benefit of a quick hitter without the negatives of having no momentum, We have the benefits of momentum without the negative of a slow developing deep handoff play and a bunch of ball handling. While I may run the ball outside in situations like this, if our wedge play is working like it usually is, we feel very comfortable getting that 1 yard with a fullback wedge play.

Developing Nuances That Work In Youth Football

The moral of the story: figure out ways to accomplish your goal without drawing boundaries around the decision making process, sometime even your kids have the right answers. We no longer have to fret on the 4th and short play call; sneak or iso/dive/power. Of course now with our Double Dive Series the defense has to contend with both the "sneak with momentum" our fullback wedge as well as the "quarterback" off-tackle run. Pick your poison defenses.

For 200 free youth football coaching tips or to sign up for Dave's free Youth Football Tips newsletter please go to:

Football Coachingl Practice Tips Copyright 2007 Cisar Management. Republishing this article is allowed if this paragraph and links are included.

Dave Cisar-

Dave has a passion for developing youth coaches so they can in turn develop teams that are competitive and well organized. He is a Nike "Coach of the Year" Designate and speaks nationwide at Coaches Clinics. His book "Winning Youth Football a Step by Step Plan" was endorsed by Tom Osborne and Dave Rimington.

With over 15 years of hands-on experience as a youth coach, Dave has developed a detailed systematic approach to developing youth players and teams. His personal teams to using this system to date have won 94% of their games in 4 Different Leagues. His web site is: Football Plays